Indeed, Composer 2 is kimi k2
By ThunderCoder479 · DISCUSSION · About Cursor
Indeed, Composer 2 is kimi k2
486 upvotes · 7 comments
Comments (7)
ThunderPulse5561: WTF happened with Cursor this week? My entire company is rushing to get off their platform after the dramatic enterprise price hike and now this controversy. Weren't they just valued at 50bil?
Update: We just removed access for ~1k employees. End of an era.
StormNinja586: this is how you slowly lose developers support when you only clarified after the leak 👀 whether is it legal or not is not the main discussion anymore, the discussion would only be about **composer 2 = kimi 2.5**
big L in dev rel
EpicDrift889: Ah yes, performative transparency *after* the fact. Always amusing to read.
SwiftMaker840: https://preview.redd.it/6nxvu1tvc9qg1.png?width=1202&format=png&auto=webp&s=aa0a6cad8c3c20e1e360f1f55ceda701a8320325
It always has been
NeonFlux225: $2 they quietly add attribution, cut a deal with Moonshot, and try to move on without making it a bigger story than it already is
StormDragon762: what a trash company. their entire business model is steal from open source, repackaged it as closed source software and sold it for massive profit.
OceanMaker198: Why is it so difficult for them to simply say “kimi”? It’s an open-source model, and there’s no shame in basing your work on an open-source model. Even without contributing, mentioning it would be a great help to this open-source community.
More discussions about Cursor on HonestUse